Discussion about this post

User's avatar
A. C. George's avatar

It makes sense to me to equate the lover of wisdom (philosopher) with the mystic (mustes). The word mystic means "initiate", one who closes eyes and ears (to go within). Entering the living inner realm, in a manner of crossing the threshold beyond the apparent, will reveal that which is otherwise hidden or occulted, synonyms to the word "mystery".

Revelation, mystery and wisdom are interdependent, interlinked and harmonic with each other, from that perspective. The mystery experiences many Greeks encountered, through the various "cults", were forbidden public disclosure. Parmenides' "On Nature", sounds like was likely a mystery tradition experience expressed around the prohibitions.

Ancient Egyptians had similar initiatory experiences, along with a monistic world-view similar to that of the mysticism of the Indian subcontinent. Differences amount to the cultural lens, diffracting the white light of the core revelation into a multicolored spectrum of a variety of differentiated expressions.

In my view, something beyond the intellect must touch the mystery, or intellectual interpretation will result in dead meaning clothed in reason. The way Parmenides expressed his revelation shows that in his case, at least, there was such a contact.

Expand full comment

No posts